<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Interactive Canvas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lilula.co.uk/2008/the-interactive-canvas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lilula.co.uk/2008/the-interactive-canvas/</link>
	<description>My name is Lilian Tula, and I&#039;m an interactive designer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fruityoaty</title>
		<link>http://lilula.co.uk/2008/the-interactive-canvas/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>fruityoaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hey-girl.org/?p=225#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dunbar&#039;s number is the supposed cognitive limit to the number of individuals with whom any one person can maintain stable social relationships: the kind of relationships that go with knowing who each person is and how each person relates socially to every other person.&quot; (Wikipedia)

The number cited is usually 150. All this social networking and &quot;communication&quot; going on, but how much of that is actually meaningful?

I think my limit is more like 50 online people. Yeah, blogging has changed my life - it made me realize that some OFFLINE relationships are more meaningful and satisfying FOR ME than ONLINE relationships. And that I have to spend more time cultivating those offline connections - family, friends, co-workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dunbar&#8217;s number is the supposed cognitive limit to the number of individuals with whom any one person can maintain stable social relationships: the kind of relationships that go with knowing who each person is and how each person relates socially to every other person.&#8221; (Wikipedia)</p>
<p>The number cited is usually 150. All this social networking and &#8220;communication&#8221; going on, but how much of that is actually meaningful?</p>
<p>I think my limit is more like 50 online people. Yeah, blogging has changed my life &#8211; it made me realize that some OFFLINE relationships are more meaningful and satisfying FOR ME than ONLINE relationships. And that I have to spend more time cultivating those offline connections &#8211; family, friends, co-workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://lilula.co.uk/2008/the-interactive-canvas/comment-page-1/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hey-girl.org/?p=225#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>Blogging hasn&#039;t changed me dramatically on a personal level, but I&#039;ve been blogging in various places for about 5 years now, and I just genuinely enjoy it - especially reading back on stuff from a long time ago, it&#039;s amazing to see how much I&#039;ve changed as a person. On the other hand, I&#039;ve always been intrigued by other people&#039;s lives, so therefore reading others&#039; blogs kind of open up my eyes to the variety of lifestyles, etc of people all over the world; and I like reading about their ideas and plans about things, it keeps things interesting :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging hasn&#8217;t changed me dramatically on a personal level, but I&#8217;ve been blogging in various places for about 5 years now, and I just genuinely enjoy it &#8211; especially reading back on stuff from a long time ago, it&#8217;s amazing to see how much I&#8217;ve changed as a person. On the other hand, I&#8217;ve always been intrigued by other people&#8217;s lives, so therefore reading others&#8217; blogs kind of open up my eyes to the variety of lifestyles, etc of people all over the world; and I like reading about their ideas and plans about things, it keeps things interesting :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam H</title>
		<link>http://lilula.co.uk/2008/the-interactive-canvas/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hey-girl.org/?p=225#comment-996</guid>
		<description>First and foremost, this is possibly one of the most visually impressive blogs I have ever visited. 

4 months ago, I knew nothing about blogging whatsoever, so the fact that I am &#039;wowed&#039; by this is testament to the way blogging is impacting people on a daily basis.

On the topic of testaments, I would like to argue that maybe Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were in fact founders of the original blog. 

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First and foremost, this is possibly one of the most visually impressive blogs I have ever visited. </p>
<p>4 months ago, I knew nothing about blogging whatsoever, so the fact that I am &#8216;wowed&#8217; by this is testament to the way blogging is impacting people on a daily basis.</p>
<p>On the topic of testaments, I would like to argue that maybe Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were in fact founders of the original blog. </p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivy</title>
		<link>http://lilula.co.uk/2008/the-interactive-canvas/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hey-girl.org/?p=225#comment-990</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t delved into post-modern philosophy since I graduated in June, so my brain is quite rusty. 

Anyway, I think the standards or ethics the guide today&#039;s blogs are heavily dependent on the niche the bloggers belong to. For a &#039;make money online&#039; blog, plastering the layout with abs is acceptable. For a designer&#039;s blogfolio, it&#039;s not always the best thing to do. This niche standard is heavily reflective on society, since each blog is manned by someone who has a certain unique background. 

From a PR perspective, this change in social media has changed the way organizations &#039;speak to&#039; the public. It is no longer top down, but a mutual conversation. The balance of power will surely change as a result. 

I don&#039;t think blogs itself have changed the way we live. It is social media as a whole (blogs, facebook, flickr, youtube etc) that has changed us. Our &#039;reality&#039; has now been replaced by a virtual reality. There is less appreciation for tangible things like snail mail (appreciation other than seeing it as a relic of nostalgia)... or so says Arthur Kroker. 

As for our personality, there is a tendency to display a facade online. Some try to create another personality, others reveal their shadows (I&#039;m referring to Jung). And I&#039;m sure that there are some that stay the same. Personally, I think I&#039;m still the same, except that I censor some things. Think of it this way: you would never completely reveal yourself to a stranger, so why would you to a million strangers online?

Anyway, I&#039;m fine in the virtual world or tangible world. It&#039;s all the same to me. After all, I still laugh when I hear a funny joke - be it over Skype or over dinner. 

This is a bloody long comment. I shall stop here. Gonna look forward to your next entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t delved into post-modern philosophy since I graduated in June, so my brain is quite rusty. </p>
<p>Anyway, I think the standards or ethics the guide today&#8217;s blogs are heavily dependent on the niche the bloggers belong to. For a &#8216;make money online&#8217; blog, plastering the layout with abs is acceptable. For a designer&#8217;s blogfolio, it&#8217;s not always the best thing to do. This niche standard is heavily reflective on society, since each blog is manned by someone who has a certain unique background. </p>
<p>From a PR perspective, this change in social media has changed the way organizations &#8217;speak to&#8217; the public. It is no longer top down, but a mutual conversation. The balance of power will surely change as a result. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think blogs itself have changed the way we live. It is social media as a whole (blogs, facebook, flickr, youtube etc) that has changed us. Our &#8216;reality&#8217; has now been replaced by a virtual reality. There is less appreciation for tangible things like snail mail (appreciation other than seeing it as a relic of nostalgia)&#8230; or so says Arthur Kroker. </p>
<p>As for our personality, there is a tendency to display a facade online. Some try to create another personality, others reveal their shadows (I&#8217;m referring to Jung). And I&#8217;m sure that there are some that stay the same. Personally, I think I&#8217;m still the same, except that I censor some things. Think of it this way: you would never completely reveal yourself to a stranger, so why would you to a million strangers online?</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m fine in the virtual world or tangible world. It&#8217;s all the same to me. After all, I still laugh when I hear a funny joke &#8211; be it over Skype or over dinner. </p>
<p>This is a bloody long comment. I shall stop here. Gonna look forward to your next entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
